WRITING / WORKFLOW 04

Content review.

Review a draft for clarity, consistency, and unsupported claims against a specific brief.

Use this template

The workflow

State the editorial brief

Explain the audience, purpose, and tone. Tell the model what must remain unchanged.

Ask for a visible review

Use a review table so you can inspect the reason for each proposed change.

Check factual drift

Compare the revision against the original. Better phrasing can still change the claim.

Accept edits deliberately

Keep changes that serve the brief. Verify factual and specialized claims independently.

IN PRACTICE / ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

Illustrative input: a service description promises 'instant results.' A useful review flags the unsupported promise and suggests a more precise statement based on the actual service.

Before you use the result

0 / 4 checked

Use this checklist while reviewing the response from your chosen tool. Checks stay in this tab and reset when the page reloads.

The revision preserves the author's meaningNo new unsupported factual claims were addedTerminology is consistentOptional preferences are separated from corrections

MAKE IT FIT YOUR TASK

Your context makes
the difference.

Build your prompt